|
Pro: sharp image, good wide angle coverage, turns night into daylight.Con: large and heavy compared to most others in this price range.
Easy install, only maybe need software for edit or capture video, for the price. Good Resolution in day and full color, it have low quality in the night, not see detail of faces of citizens at 15m.
In Kentucky 35 is a "warm" day in the winter. After another month (it was mid-winter by now) the day vision only worked if the temperature was above about 35 degrees outside. I'm giving up on this thing and trying the more expensive Q-See camera. Well, things started off pretty good with a decent picture day and night, but after 3-4 months, the night vision failed to work. After another month, the day vision only worked in black and white.
Well, I'd say pretty darn good. It's not 45 feetmore like 25, But thats still pretty good.
The picture in night vision mode is kinda grainy, but almost all night vision I have ever seen isto some degree or another. Within that 25 feet, people light up like the 4th of Julyyou can't miss em.
I was surprised at the picture you get off this thing. However the night vision part is where it falls short.
If you're looking for a low-cost camera that has 'ok' night vision capabilities, then this will definetlyfit the bill. I figured for ~$75 how good could it be.
I can honestly say I could not expect better picture quality fora sub-$100 camera.
This illuminates the area w/ the IR. I have had two of these in operation for a year. I recommend this camera, especially since the price has come down $25. You can also use a dedicated IR illuminator to improve night vision range. They are able to handle huge temperature extremes without a hitch. They work best when mounted up high.
|
